The K Report

  Background 8 years as Kronenwetter trustee. Numerous chairmanships, etc. Why are you running for the Kronenwetter Village Board, and what perspectives or experiences would guide your approach to the role? As a life-long resident of Kronenwetter, my perspective has always been to advocate for the rights, best interests, and overall good of the taxpayers who live here. I stay independent of cliques or other little special interest groups. I never thought of myself as working for "the village", but instead, I work for the benefit of the people first and foremost. In other words, while I often work with staff, Board members or committees on a positive basis, when the interests of the Village administration, employees, or Village "establishment" conflicts with transparency, rights, benefits or other obligations to the people, it is the benefit to the people that is my priority. This is not always an easy position to maintain, but it is one of th...

        With each election there seems to come out of the woodwork a fabricated "new issue" for my enemies on the political left to magnify and dramatize.     This year, they have dredged up the "von Briesen Report" as their hope for a smear campaign, because apparently it is the best they can come up with.   This is Part 2 of three posts regarding the lack of factual basis  for the von B report, and its.     In this part, we look at the information discussed at the March 24, 2025 Village Board meeting ; agenda Item O - "Von Briesen Report Review", and the facts in that agenda report itself.    Issues raised at that meeting include the spurious nature of the von Briesen report, particularly, the lack of fact or objectivity of the investigator, and/or those at the Village that were secretly involved in creating this $67,000, $3000 per page document.   Some quick facts about the background of the...

    Be sure to check out my other recent posts as to election matters and my position on village issues.    With each election there seems to come out of the woodwork a fabricated "new issue" for my enemies on the political left to magnify and dramatize.     These people cannot seem to find legitimate Village issues to raise or discuss, or find any fault with my performance as a Village trustee as it applies to Village best interests, so they rely this sort of thing.    The soup of the day that they are serving up for this election seems to be "the von Briesen Report". This is an issue that has been dealt with and repudiated several times in the past almost 2 years. But here they are again resurrecting a discredited document.      I have addressed this issue in two separate posts already; Chris Voll's and Aaron Myszka's "von Briesen Report" Part 2 - A $65,000 crime against Kronenwetter Taxpayers   Unbelievable ...

I have removed this article as a gesture of goodwill to those involved.  I have assurances from the Administrator that in the future  the budget process will start earlier in the year and be more transparent, and allow  public and committee review and input. Thanks

This post is not about the arguable dental benefit of fluoride applied to teeth, but whether the touted benefit is worth the detrimental and toxic effects of systemic water fluoridation.  T his concerns not only effects of neurological harm to babies and infants, but growing evidence of it being a contributing cause of Alzheimer's condition, bone cancer in boys, osteoporosis, and other medical conditions. While information both pro and con states that fluoridated water may have a benefit due to its momentary contact with teeth as it is swallowed, both sides seem to agree that the alleged benefit ends there. The concern is with the harmfulness to the rest of the body once this chemical is ingested. Along with this concern, is the fact that many people, especially children, are getting plenty of fluoride exposure from toothpaste, mouth rinses, and other sources. None of which is monitored to determine the overall daily fluoride exposure. This exposure is in addition to the...